Cryptocurrency Gambling
Exploring the Intersection of Two Disruptive Forces
Introduction
Cryptocurrency and blockchain technology have gained significant attention in recent years, with their disruptive potential reaching various sectors, including the gambling industry. The fusion of these two forces has the potential to bring about noticeable effects on regulators, industry stakeholders, and gamblers alike. However, despite the growing prevalence of cryptocurrencies and blockchain, there is still much to be understood about their functionalities and implications.
Cryptocurrencies are digital assets native to blockchain systems, serving various purposes in economic coordination mechanisms. They can be used as remuneration for securing the immutability of a network’s transaction database. Blockchain technology, on the other hand, is a collaborative infrastructure that manages, maintains, and secures a distributed database. It offers new avenues for gamblers to access decentralized casinos, which operate transparently with cryptocurrency and provide a pseudo-anonymous and unregulated gambling environment.
While decentralized casinos have not gained significant traction among cryptocurrency users in terms of volume, there is a growing body of research exploring the association between cryptocurrency trading and gambling. These studies primarily focus on the structural similarities between the two activities and the psychological aspects that influence owners and users of cryptocurrency. However, the interplay between these psychological aspects and gambling has not yet been fully explored in the literature.
Given the increasing relevance of cryptocurrency in Western societies and the popularity of stock-trading applications that also offer cryptocurrency trading, it is becoming increasingly important to investigate the broader relationship between cryptocurrency involvement and gambling. This article aims to delve into the intersection of cryptocurrency trading and gambling, exploring the variables that differentiate users involved in both activities and examining the demographic and socioeconomic profiles of these users. Additionally, the study aims to identify patterns of cryptocurrency involvement among users who also gamble.
Methodology
To explore the patterns of cryptocurrency use and gambling involvement, a representative cross-sectional survey of 3864 Germans was conducted. The survey gathered data on participants’ cryptocurrency knowledge, ownership, attitudes, and usage. Cluster analysis was employed to identify extensive behavioral patterns in cryptocurrency involvement among users who also engage in gambling.
Differentiating Crypto-Gamblers from Users of Cryptocurrency and Gambling
The study aimed to identify the variables that differentiate users involved in both cryptocurrency and gambling, referred to as “crypto-gamblers,” from those who only participate in one activity. While the study found significant differences between the focus groups in terms of variables related to mental, proactive, and financial involvement, there were some commonalities in both activities. For instance, the hope for high gains was identified as a common motive for participating in both cryptocurrency trading and gambling.
Demographic and Socioeconomic Profile of Crypto-Gamblers
Understanding the demographic and socioeconomic profile of users involved in both cryptocurrency and gambling is crucial in closing the research gap in this area. The study found that crypto-gamblers tended to be younger compared to stock traders and gamblers who traded high-risk stocks. Most crypto-gamblers were between the ages of 18 and 30, male, had a bachelor’s degree, and were employed and in a relationship. These findings shed light on the characteristics of this tech-affine subgroup.
Patterns of Cryptocurrency Involvement among Crypto-Gamblers
In addition to exploring the demographic and socioeconomic profiles, the study aimed to identify patterns of cryptocurrency involvement among crypto-gamblers. By differentiating between mental, proactive, and financial involvement, the study expanded on the existing model of cryptocurrency involvement. The findings revealed various patterns of involvement, highlighting the different levels of engagement and behavior among crypto-gamblers.
Implications for Future Research and Protective Measures
This study contributes to the scientific discourse on the intersection of cryptocurrency trading and gambling by providing insights into the variables that differentiate crypto-gamblers from users involved in either activity. The research also sheds light on the demographic and socioeconomic profiles of crypto-gamblers and identifies patterns of cryptocurrency involvement among this subgroup. These findings lay the foundation for future research and can inform the development of protective measures for users at risk.
Conclusion
The intersection of cryptocurrency gambling brings together two disruptive forces that have the potential to revolutionize the gambling industry. This study explored the relationship between cryptocurrency trading and gambling, unveiling the variables that differentiate users involved in both activities and providing insights into the demographic and socioeconomic profiles of crypto-gamblers. The findings contribute to the existing knowledge on cryptocurrency involvement and lay the groundwork for further research and protective measures in this space.
Ethical Considerations
The survey conducted for this study adhered to professional ethics and data protection guidelines. The panel provider ensured compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and followed established guidelines for professional conduct in opinion and market research.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant or funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethics Statement
The author confirms that all data used in this study was sourced in accordance with ethical standards.
Data Availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Arthur, D., & Delfabbro, P. (2016). Predictors of day trading and poker playing among australian online wagering service subscribers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(2), 583-596.
Delfabbro, P., King, D. L., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). From adolescent to adult gambling: An analysis of longitudinal gambling patterns in south australia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(1), 261-276.
Griffiths, M. D. (2018). A “component model” of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 23(4), 349-353.
Meng, Y., & Fu, Y. (2020). The influence of investor sentiment on Bitcoin returns and volatility. Finance Research Letters, 33, 101158.
Mora, N., Benitez, J., & Levens, M. (2021). Cryptocurrencies in Germany: A survey of the German population on knowledge, ownership, and usage. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100526.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin.org.
Rauchs, M., Dorier, M., Vasileiou, K., & Ramirez, C. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and distributed ledgers. FCA Occasional Paper, 44.
Steinmetz, F., Vurma, A., Rieger, F., & Weitzel, T. (2021). The role of ideology in cryptocurrency adoption. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100684.
Werbach, K. (2016). Trust, but verify: Why the blockchain needs the law. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository.
